Beginning a very interesting exchange into the question of whether “prefab is the answer” with an article on Jetson Green, Chad Ludeman took an informed look at the prefab industry concluding that it is not “the best way of delivering modern design to the average new home buyer.” Chad is the president of Philadelphia-based postgreen and developer of the 100k House.
In a equally thought out response, Lloyd Alter of Treehugger (and a player in the prefab industry) calls the question of whether houses built on-site or prefabs are better at best a tie citing James Kunstler’s assertion that the American suburban experiment is dead and that the landscape is going to keep changing.
If you are interested in prefab and want to know some of the underlying issues you can read these very well informed articles here:
Chad’s original article on Jetson Green:
Prefab is Not The Answer to Affordable, Modern & Green Homes
(don’t miss the comments…)
Lloyd’s response on Treehugger:
Another Opinion: Prefab is Not the Answer to Affordable, Modern and Green Homes
(again… don’t miss the comments.)
Lloyd’s second response on Treehugger:
Allyson Wendt’s response on BuildingGreen.com:
Can Prefab be Green and Affordable?
Incoming search terms:
- affordable green modern homes
- affordable modern prefab homes
- affordable small green homes
- affordable smallcontemporary home
- prefabricated home small green affordable